| Top 10 Websites Among African-Americans |
|
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
|
Yahoo Sites
Time Warner Network
Microsoft Sites
Google Sites
Fox Interactive Media
eBay
Ask Network
Amazon Sites
Apple Computer
Wal-Mart
|
Source: comScore |
| Top 10 Podcasts |
|
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
|
This American Life
Stuff You Should Know
NPR: Wait Wait – Don’t Tell Me
Best of YouTube
American Idol
NPR: Fresh Air
Comedy Central: Stand-Up
MSNBC Countdown
NPR: Car Talk
Oprah and Eckhart Tolle's "A New Earth" Online Class
|
Source: iTunes |
| Top 10 iTunes Downloads |
|
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
|
David Cook – The Time of My Life
Coldplay – Viva la Vida
Kate Perry – I Kissed a Girl
Rihanna – Take a Bow
Natasha Bedingfield – Pocketful of Sunshine
Leona Lewis – Bleeding Love
David Cook – Dream Big
Madonna (ft. Justin Timberlake & Timbaland) – 4 Minutes
Lil Wayne – Lollipop
David Cook – I Still Haven’t Found What I’m Looking For
|
Source: iTunes |
| Billboard Top 10 Albums |
|
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
|
Death Cab For Cutie – Narrow Stairs
Frank Sinatra – Nothing But The Best
Jason Mraz – We Sing. We Dance. We Steal Things
Duffy – Rockferry
Leona Lewis – Spirit
Mariah Carey– E=MC2
Neil Diamond – Home Before Dark
Madonna – Hard Candy
Toby Keith – 35 Biggest Hits
Keith Sweat – Just Me
|
Source: Billboard |
| Top 10-Ringtone Downloads |
|
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
|
David Cook – The Time of My Life
Kate Perry – I Kissed a Girl
Usher (ft. Beyonce and Lil Wayne) – Live In This Club, Pt. II
Leona Lewis – Bleeding Love
Plies (ft. Ne-Yo) – Bust It Baby, Pt. 2
Natasha Bedingfield – Pocketful of Sunshine
Metro Station – Shake It
Ray J (ft. Yung Berg) – Sexy Can I
Madonna (ft. Justin Timberlake & Timbaland) – 4 Minutes
Jordin Sparks & Chris Brown – No Air
|
Source: iTunes |
| Top TV Shows |
|
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
|
American Idol – Wednesday (FOX)
American Idol – Tuesday (FOX)
Dancing With The Stars (ABC)
CSI: Miami (CBS)
Without A Trace (CBS)
Dancing With The Stars Results (ABC)
NBA Playoffs – Saturday (ABC)
Grey’s Anatomy – Thursday (ABC)
CSI (CBS)
CSI: NY (CBS)
|
Source: Nielsen Media Research
|
| Top 10 Network TV Show Websites |
|
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
|
American Idol (Fox)
Dancing With The Stars (ABC)
Survivor: Micronesia (CBS)
Deal or No Deal (NBC)
America’s Most Wanted (FOX)
The Office (NBC)
Lost (ABC)
Grey’s Anatomy (ABC)
The Bachelor (ABC)
Gossip Girl (The CW)
|
Source: Marketing Charts |
| Top 5 Viral Videos |
|
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
|
Pork and Beans - Weezer
MUTO a Wall-Painted Animation by BLU
Apple Mac Music Video
The Empire Strikes Barack
Facebook In Reality
|
Source: Viral Video Charts |
|
 |
May 2008: African-Americans
quick links
websites to watch: african-americans
websites to watch - general
blog trends
technology trends
marketing: african-americans
interesting articles: african-americans
interesting articles: general
websites to watch: african-americans
Rushmore Drive
A new search engine geared towards providing results specifically relevant to African-Americans. Just launched by IAC, Rushmore Drive is based on the Ask.com search engine, but gives greater weight to results geared toward perceived African-American interests.
The Root
Launched by The Washington Post, The Root is a daily online magazine that provides thought-provoking commentary on today's news from a variety of black perspectives.
websites to watch - general
Zookazoo
ZooKazoo is an online environment of imaginary and adventurous destinations where children can safely hang out, have fun, and make their world a better place.
Trendpedia
Trendpedia finds trends in social media. You choose the topics, enter the keywords, and click “Search Trend”. Trendpedia organizes the articles in a trendline that shows the popularity of the topic over time – you can track a topic’s trendline from three months ago up to today.
Ideeli
Enjoy the cheap chic of a sample sale without the sharp-elbowed frenzy. Ideeli.com sells incredible accessories, available for a limited time, at sample sale prices.
blog trends
Media Take Out
Media Take Out is a blog-style gossip website catering to African-Americans.
Rings
The recently launched New York Times Olympics blog covers the 2008 Beijing Games from every angle – the politics, the arts, the culture, the competition.
Stereohyped
Stereohyped is a black-interest blog delivering a mix of news and politics, entertainment and celebrities, education and career, dating and sex, and travel and culture.
technology trends
Hop-On 1800
Hop-On, Inc. announced that its GSM cell phone, the Hop1800, is now available in the United States for $10. One of the new breed of ultra convenient cell phones, the pre-paid HOP1800 is ideal as a backup cell phone, when traveling abroad, or for anyone looking for a super affordable cell phone that does one thing extremely well: make phone calls.
Fuji FinePix Z200fd
The FinePix Z200fd is a perfect social camera. In addition to the Face Detection technology and people-friendly self-timers modes, the FinePix Z200fd features a Blog mode, which resizes images for easy upload to social networking sites such as Facebook, and an Auction mode, which combines up to four photos in one frame – ideal for eBay users.
Netflix Roku
Netflix's first streaming box is finally here. First of all, the box is $99, and designed by Roku. It's fanless and quiet; has HDMI and optical outputs; and is about the size of five CD cases stacked together. Any Netflix disc mailing plan over $9 gets you unlimited streaming of almost 10,000 titles.
marketing: african-americans
Affluent African-Americans Buoy Community Buying Power
The African-American community’s buying power is expected to top $1.1 trillion dollars by 2012 – a nearly 30% jump – driven in large part by a relatively small affluent sub-segment, according to a new paper from Packaged Facts.
more info
Affluent African Americans Represent 45% of AA Buying Power
According to a recent Packaged Facts study, reported by MarketingCharts, African Americans are crucial to the consumer economy, with a population of 39 million and buying power of $892 billion, and expected to exceed $1.1 trillion in 2012. This represents a cumulative growth of 28.4% during the forecast period.
more info
African-American-Targeted Ad Spending
National Cable Up, Syndicated TV down
Advertising spending on media outlets that reach African-American consumers totaled almost $2.3 billion from October 2006 to September 2007, according to The Nielsen Company.
more info
The Catch-22 of Buying Black Media
You Should Be Buying Black-Owned Media, But There's Not Much Left-And It's Hard to Find Outlets With Scale
Examining the decline of black media in the ever more complex arena of advertising. more info
Minorities Dominate Use of New Media
According to BIGresearch's most recent Simultaneous Media Survey, African Americans, Hispanics, Asians and Whites not only use traditional media differently, their adoption of new media is also quite unique. more info
TBS Is Down with Def Jam to Hype ‘House of Payne’
TBS is playing for viral viewership response for its second season of top-rated ad-supported cable sitcom “House of Payne” based on buzz about an original song from Def Jam Recordings’ Chrisette Michele in a music video featuring the show’s cast. more info
H'wood Hits Mark in Targeting Black Auds
When Screen Gems released "This Christmas," aimed at a black audience, the reviews were tepid. "The critics talked about how (the movie) had this 'ridiculous dance sequence,'" says Screen Gems topper Clint Culpepper. "What they don't know – because the movie wasn't made for them – is that this thing called a 'Soul Train' line is such a tradition in African-American homes." more info
interesting articles: african-americans
Nearer to Overcoming
Barack Obama's Success Shows that the Ceiling Has Risen for African-Americans. But Many are Still Too Close to the Floor
African-Americans have risen to hold prominent ranks in business and government, but many still struggle with poverty and joblessness. What ails Black America?
more info
Next in Line
African American Filmmakers Are Ready with Stories to Tell. They're Arriving Behind Trailblazers, But Lately, The Going Has Been a Bit Tricky.
With his 1986 breakout film, "She's Gotta Have it," director Spike Lee unwittingly kicked open the door for a new wave of young independent African American filmmakers armed with audacious visions and fresh perspectives about black life. But now, more than 20 years later, and in a time when race has taken center stage in presidential politics, another type of African American filmmaker has established himself as the dominant voice. more info
interesting articles - general
Trends Point The Way To Goji Berries, Gluten-Free Comestibles
What's the big deal with gluten? And what is it, anyway? Who cares – you don't need it, and soon you'll know that. Gluten-free is just one of several new food trends that the Center for Culinary Development (CCD) says is going to show up in greater quantity on store shelves and restaurants – including the fast kind – in coming years. more info
Is U.S. Innovation Headed Offshore?
Apparently Not, Even Though More Research and Development Is Joining Manufacturing in the Shift toward Low-Cost Nations
To those worried about America's ability to compete in the 21st century, the trend is alarming: Just as key manufacturing industries fled offshore in the 1970s and '80s, U.S. companies are now shifting more engineering and design work to low-cost nations such as China, India, and Russia. Surely, innovation itself must follow. Apparently not, according to a new study published by the National Academies, the Washington organization that advises the U.S. government on science and technology policy.
more info
Does Being Ethical Pay?
Companies Spend Huge Amounts of Money To Be 'Socially Responsible.' Do Consumers Reward Them For It? And How Much?
For corporations, social responsibility has become a big business. Companies spend billions of dollars doing good works – everything from boosting diversity in their ranks to developing eco-friendly technology – and then trumpeting those efforts to the public. But does it pay off? more info
Study: Gay, Lesbian Consumers Favor 'Friendly' Brands
Bravo, Apple, Showtime, HBO, Absolut and Levi were cited as the gay-friendliest brands, in a study released this week by Clark, Martire & Bartolomeo. On the other hand, Wal-Mart, Dunkin' Donuts, Cracker Barrel, ExxonMobil and Samsung received the lowest marks. more info
Consumers Are Dining In More – At The Supermarket
A recession may not be officially under way, but it has already claimed a victim and a beneficiary – casual dining chains and supermarkets, respectively. Some argue that the frozen food category is also suddenly hot. more info
Affluent African-Americans Buoy Community Buying Power
Marketing Daily
February 13, 2008
The African-American community’s buying power is expected to top $1.1 trillion dollars by 2012 – a nearly 30% jump – driven in large part by a relatively small affluent sub-segment, according to a new paper from Packaged Facts.
According to the study, "The African American Market in the U.S.," the 2.4 million African-American households identified as "affluent" (with annual incomes of $75,000 or more) represent only 17% of the total African-American market but account for 45% of its buying power. Reflective of the economy as a whole, the rich tended to get richer in the African-American community as well, Robert Brown, one of the authors of the report, tells Marketing Daily.
"Affluence has affected the African-American market to the same degree as the rest of the economy," Brown says. He notes, however, that the average annual affluent African-American income of $122,000 is less than that of affluent whites or non-Hispanic minorities, he says.
In terms of buying and spending, African-Americans are more likely to buy food and clothes – particularly dress clothes – than other ethnic groups. They are also more influenced – or at least less distrustful – of television advertising, and prefer to shop in person rather than online.
According to the study, more than 3 million African-American men bought suits over the past 12 months, representing 22% of all suit purchases. (Some 3.4 million African-American women bought suits in the past 12 months, reflecting 26% of all women's suit purchases.)
In terms of advertising, television still continues to be a main driver for African-Americans, with 42% of African-American families having four or more television sets (versus 32% of other households). They also have a less negative view of advertising, with only 18% saying they don't like advertising in general (versus 39% of the general population) and only 15% viewing it as a waste of their time (versus 32% of the general population). "African-Americans have a less negative view of advertising, and/or a more positive view of what advertising can do for them," Brown says.
In general, African-Americans are most receptive to pharmaceutical advertising, being more likely to seek out advertised medications (30% versus 24%), and are more likely to believe its worth paying more for brand-name prescriptions (24% versus 16%).
African-Americans are also more likely to pay for digital cable than the general population (35% to 27%), and are more likely to purchase premium channels like HBO. The most popular cable network is BET, and while professional football programming is still the most-watched sport by all men, African-American men watch more professional basketball than other American men, according to the report.
While African-American newspaper readership lags behind the general population (32% versus 39%), those readers are more likely to rely on magazines for information (16% versus 14%) and entertainment (12% versus 10%), and are more likely to believe spending money on magazines is worthwhile (25% versus 19%).
The Internet, meanwhile, has had less of an impact on African-American media usage than the general population; African-Americans are less likely to cite the Internet as a resource for information or to say that it has taken time away from television or magazine usage, according to the report. They are also less likely to have made a purchase over the Internet than the general population (26% versus 44%).
In part because they're more often brick-and-mortar shoppers, African-Americans are more influenced by in-store promotions than the general population. They are more likely to visit more stores while shopping, but are less influenced by sales and discounts. And they are more likely to cite themselves as trendsetters and influencers when it comes to buying items. "A lot of that is a product of the urban culture [leading fashion and other trends]," Brown says. "It is a pattern that would hold across other urban segments as well."
Back to top
Affluent African Americans Represent 45% of AA Buying Power
Center for Media Research
February 20, 2008
According to a recent Packaged Facts study, reported by MarketingCharts, African Americans are crucial to the consumer economy, with a population of 39 million and buying power of $892 billion, and expected to exceed $1.1 trillion in 2012. This represents a cumulative growth of 28.4% during the forecast period.
Additional findings from the study:
54% of African-American buying power lives in the South. Other key buying power segments:
- Residents of central cities ($430 billion, or 48% of the total)
- Married couples ($428 billion or 48% of the total)
- Households with an income of $75,000 or more ($405 billion, or 45% of the total)
There are 2.4 million African-Americans in $75K+ households, and they are:
- More likely than other affluent consumers to spend money on fashionable dress, toiletries and cosmetics, and cruise vacations
- Less likely to use the internet to plan shopping trips, gather information for shopping, or make online purchases
African-American consumers create a wide range of possibilities for marketers in various industries:
- 3.9 million black consumers spend $150 or more per week on groceries.
- 7.6 million African Americans said they exercise regularly at home, which opens up possibilities for marketers of exercise equipment
- African-American men and women represent 22% and 26% of all suit-buyers, respectively
- Approximately 9 million African Americans plan to buy a new vehicle, accounting for more than 9% of all consumers who plan to purchase a new vehicle
Black media continue to offer advertisers access to African-American consumers, who also share many of the mainstream media preferences of other American viewers and readers:
- Television is a top source of media consumption, with 4 in 10 households containing 4 or more televisions.
- Spending on magazines is 6% more than the national average.
- Radio and newspapers are less popular than the average.
- Internet use is still lagging, but by 2012 penetration in the African-American community is expected to reach 62%.
Back to top
African-American-Targeted Ad Spending
National Cable Up, Syndicated TV down.
eMarkerter
February 6, 2008
Advertising spending on media outlets that reach African-American consumers totaled almost $2.3 billion from October 2006 to September 2007, according to The Nielsen Company.
The study did not account for spending on general circulation media intended to reach African-American consumers.
More than a third of the nearly $2.3 billion went to local radio, accounting for the largest ad spending category measured, at $805 million.
Nielsen said that national cable TV had the highest ad spending growth rate over the prior one-year period, at 14.5%.
Spending on ads for syndicated TV programs with a 50% or greater composition of African-American audiences was down year over year, at $102.4 million dollars.
The Nielsen study did not include online ad spending.
Nielsen Monitor-Plus told eMarketer that spending on these media categories aimed at African-American consumers fell 4.4% from the prior one-year period.
Ad spending excluding the Internet grew at a paltry 0.5% in 2007 for the US overall, according to eMarketer.
Local radio ad spending, which accounted for such a large portion of African-American targeted media, was down 1.8% for the first three quarters of 2007 compared with the first three quarters of 2006 for the US as a whole, according to TNS Media Intelligence data released in December 2007.
So the 4.4% dip in African-American-targeted media ad spending (excluding the Internet), although hardly insignificant in dollar terms, was not outsized as a percentage, given the sluggish growth for US media excluding the Internet and the decline in all local radio ad spending.
Media Audit has noted that African-American consumers generally spend more time with media than does the general US population.
The study, conducted from January 2006 to April 2007, found that African-Americans spent almost an hour more a day watching TV and 37 more minutes a day listening to radio than did the general population. Comparative data were not given for time spent on the Internet.
The research company did include the Internet in a measurement of the time African-American consumers spent with media compared with the general population.
The study, which examined time spent with radio, TV, newspapers, billboards and the Internet on a typical day, showed African-Americans spending an average of 692 minutes a day with these media, compared with the average of 608 minutes a day for the whole population.
Back to top
The Catch-22 of Buying Black Media
You Should Be Buying Black-Owned Media, But There's Not Much Left-And It's Hard to Find Outlets With Scale
Ad Age
April 7, 2008
The chief marketing officer dreads opening the survey request from the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People each fall.
The request is always the same: Detailed data on where the brand this CMO manages spends its sizeable advertising budget-including black-owned media. And each year, the request for a breakdown of ad budget is politely declined by the marketing chief, who cites its proprietary nature.
And so each year, the brand winds up with an F in the area of marketing and communications-along with 16 others-in the NAACP annual Consumer Spending Guide. The stated goal is to measure corporate America's relationship with the African-American community-a consumer segment that represents 13% of the U.S. population with spending power of $845 billion in 2007-a figure expected to leap to more than $1.1 trillion by 2012, according to the University of Georgia's Selig Center for Economic Growth.
``All things being equal, we'd have no problem supporting'' black-owned media, said the CMO, but ``a lot of the true African-American owned media companies are small and very decentralized. That doesn't fit our strategy of needing to have a national reach. We have looked at some of the options, but the delivery is so small in relation to cost it doesn't fit our strategy.''
The survey's goal is to urge the black community to buy from marketers that support black media and to boost media ownership within the community, according to Richard McIntire, a spokesman for the organization. ``Brands have these huge budgets, and less than 1% is reinvested back into African-American media,'' Mr. McIntire said. ``The black press does not see the advertising dollars coming from major corporations who will advertise in a market with two dailies but won't in the smaller community papers.''
But some marketers argue that in an ever-more-complex media environment, it's not that simple. In a world of scale-and the benefits of lower ad pricing that come with it-there are few independent, black-owned media outlets left to support, and those that exist don't have the reach to offer competitive rates.
Some of the biggest names in black media today actually are owned by corporate titans. The most notable example is BET, which founder Bob Johnson sold to Viacom for $3 billion in 2000. Then there's Essence: Time Warner's publishing arm took full ownership of the legacy brand in January 2005.
But the most dismal rate of media ownership among African-Americans is in TV. Only five African-Americans own full-power commercial TV stations; they collectively own eight out of 1,379 commercials stations nationwide (see story above).
``It's not an impossible environment, but it's tough,'' said Lyle Banks, founder and CEO of Banks Broadcasting in Chicago, which owned two TV stations before selling KSCW-TV, Wichita, Ks., to Schurz Communications in August 2007. ``It's not just minorities. For anyone coming in the last two years, it's difficult to raise enough money to buy into TV stations that are being sought by those who have scale and lower costs. You might have enough money to buy one TV station in a medium or a small market, but unless you plan to hold on to that station and grow it, it's going to be very difficult to buy more stations to survive in this competitive business.''
The minority-ownership rate in TV has plummeted in recent years, falling nearly 70% in the past decade, according to a 2007 Free Press study.
Recent declines in TV ownership are attributed to the bankruptcy in May 2007 of a single company: New York-based Granite Broadcasting, which operated nine stations in seven states. That's not to say that TV ownership among African-Americans was ever strong.
In fact, it wasn't until 1975 that an African-American even owned a TV station. In 1978, among other new policies, the Federal Communications Commission tried to encourage minority ownership by giving tax deferrals on capital gains to radio or TV owners when they sold stations to minorities. Additionally, tax certificates were awarded to investors for giving start-up capital to minorities to buy radio or TV stations. Ownership rates peaked in the mid-1990s, according to the National Association of Black Owned Broadcasters, when African-Americans owned 23 TV stations and 240 radio stations. But after the Republican takeover of Congress in January 1995, Congress voted to eliminate the tax programs.
A year later, the 1996 Telecommunications Act relaxed ownership rules-prompting some of the most successful African-American TV owners to sell out to bigger players. ``Some of them did very well, and most of them who cashed out did so because they figured they couldn't compete anymore,'' said Jim Winston, executive director of NABOB.
But TV is certainly not the only place where black-owned media outlets are in decline. Newspapers historically have been an area of strength for black ownership. Blacks published newspapers as early as the 1820s, and there were 250 newspapers operated by African-Americans by 1950, according to a report by the Minority Media and Telecommunications Council.
Yet today, there is no longer a daily black-owned newspaper. The last daily black newspaper, the Chicago Defender, cut back to a weekly schedule in February.
And since 2000, the industry's trade group, the Black Press of America, has seen its membership decline to 189 weekly newspapers from 300. National weekly circulation for its members has dropped to 250,000 from a high of 500,000 in 2000, according to John Smith Sr., chairman of the trade group. Mr. Smith, publisher of The Atlanta Inquirer, a weekly newspaper with a circulation of 42,000 (down from 60,000 two years ago), blames the internet for the circulation declines.
Indeed, with advertisers stampeding toward digital marketing, it's hard to overlook the fact that not a single legacy black media brand has made a successful transition to the online world. Consider EbonyJet.com: Its traffic is so small it doesn't register with ComScore or Nielsen. The website aggregating the biggest black audience online is Time Warner's Black Voices. The second-most popular is BlackPlanet.com-owned by five Asians.
But Eric Blankfein, senior VP-channel insights director at Horizon Media, New York, said advertisers should not just look at traffic figures, noting that there are opportunities to gain more credibility with the audience by buying in outlets owned by African-Americans.
``Our research shows that web environments, even those below the radar, so-called grass-roots websites that may not see a whole lot of ad support but have a high contextual relevance among consumers, can give marketers instant credibility,'' he said. ``From an advertising standpoint, you need to be in media that is credible to your market. If it is credible and minority-owned, that's valuable to the advertiser.''
In 2001, Black Press launched a national network and news portal, BlackPressUSA.com, ``to bridge the gap as far as technology is concerned for member newspapers,'' Mr. Smith said. Despite the efforts, the site has garnered little traffic and has yet to register with ComScore and Nielsen/NetRatings. Mr. Smith said the site gets about 10,000 hits a week.
Yet prominent advertisers have bought ads on BlackPressUSA.com, including Home Depot, Microsoft, Sprint, Coca-Cola, General Motors and Comcast.
``All of us, in time, must find a way to have a combination of the two forms-both print and online,'' Mr. Smith said. ``We must be able to face up to the challenge of new technology or we, too, will go by the wayside.''
It's not limited to newspapers. The legacy magazine brands-Ebony, Jet, Essence and Black Enterprise, all black-owned except Essence-are struggling to gain new readers. Average circulation was essentially flat from 2006 to 2007 for all four, according to the Magazine Publishers of America (see chart, P. 28).
The low rate of media ownership in broadcast has been blamed by some on the policies of the FCC, including David Honig, executive director of the Minority Media and Telecommunications Council. ``The relative success of minorities in the weekly-newspaper industry was possible because no federal agency acted as the gatekeeper of newsprint and ink,'' Mr. Honig wrote in a recent report. ``In broadcasting ... the FCC's regulatory policies ensured that media companies could not cross the line from print to broadcasting.''
Indeed, it wasn't until 1949 that an African-American even owned a radio station, and by 1971, there were only six minority-owned stations.
That's not to say ownership rates in radio are stellar today, even if they do surpass that of TV; African-Americans own just 3.4% of the full-power commercial broadcast radio stations nationwide.
The largest black-owned radio company is Radio One, based in Lanham, Md. The company operates 53 radio stations in 17 urban markets but has been struggling of late. On March 23, it announced plans to sell KRBV-FM in Los Angeles for $137.5 million, using some of the proceeds to invest in its internet strategy, according to Chief Content Officer-Interactive Smokey Fontaine. ``If we can reach more African-Americans than our competitors at the other big media companies online, we can then offer more reach to advertisers.''
But to some, it's more than a question of reach. ``Media targeted to African-Americans is not valued to the degree that other media is,'' said Earl Graves Jr., president-CEO of Black Enterprise, publisher of Black Enterprise magazine, which has a subscription base of 525,000 and an estimated 4 million readers.
Since 1970, the magazine has published an annual list of the top 100 black-owned businesses, including media companies (see chart, P. 29). After the takeover of Essence by Time, Mr. Graves removed the legacy media brand from the list. Despite the magazine's tough stance on what constitutes a black-media property, Mr. Graves questioned whether efforts such as the NAACP's survey does black-owned media any favors, especially in reshaping marketer misconceptions of the value of targeting black consumers.
``It's counterproductive when people feel they are filling it out under duress,'' he said, suggesting instead the argument for spending more on black media should be made on economic grounds. ``Tell me how this makes sense: 15% to 20% of your business is coming from this market but you spend less than half to one-half percent of your marketing budget on it.''
Linda Jefferson, senior VP-media at Burrell Communications, said for advertisers to capitalize on demographic trends, there needs to be not only better media-ownership rates in the black community but more content-creation opportunities as well. ``It's not an either/or; they are both important,'' she said, adding: ``When will there be a black Rupert Murdoch?''
``Given our contribution to the overall economy,'' she said, ``it is absolutely an abysmal statement that we don't own more and aren't in control of our story and of where it's told and when it's told.''
Michelle Ebanks, president and publisher of Essence since 2005, when Time Inc. acquired full ownership of the magazine from its founders, said the focus on ownership often overshadows the rights of African-American business owners. ``I respect the pride of black ownership and the critical importance it is to our community. I also respect the right of individuals to then sell their business to a public entity if they believe that is in their best interests,'' Ms. Ebanks said.
For marketers, she said, the question of ownership also fails to address the lack of content created for the market. ``The audience is underserved by content across all the media platforms, and the audience is under-targeted by marketers. As such, there is an opportunity to create more content that is speaking directly to African-Americans,'' she said.
Henry Louis Gates Jr., director of the W.E.B. Du Bois Institute for African and African-American Research at Harvard University and editor in chief of the Washington Post Co.'s The Root, a site intended to be a ``black version of Slate,'' dismisses the notion that ownership is the crucial factor. ``There's a romantic, black-nationalist ideal that it's great if everything is all-black-owned. But what's all-black-owned? We are living in an era of a multinational, multicultural environment. Diversity is the rule. Interrelationships are the rule.''
Not so, said Leonard M. Baynes, professor of law and director of the Ronald H. Brown Center for Civil Rights and Economic Development. ``Owning the media channel is the only way to be assured you can have a voice.''
Said Black Enterprise's Mr. Graves: ``If all ethnically owned media goes away and the people who control the channels say, `That African-American voice is too angry or too controversial; I'm just not going to have you on the air anymore,' it would be a disaster for people of color in this country.''
Back to top
Minorities Dominate Use of New Media
Center for Media Research
May 28, 2008
According to BIGresearch's most recent Simultaneous Media Survey, African Americans, Hispanics, Asians and Whites not only use traditional media differently, their adoption of new media is also quite unique. When it comes to traditional media, types of TV shows watched as well as radio formats listened to most often differ by consumer group.
Although movies are the most watched type of TV show among all categories, according to the study:
- 66% of African Americans are most likely to watch them regularly
- 63.6% of Hispanics watch them regularly
- 52.5% of Asians watch them regularly
- 51.4% of Whites watch them regularly
Dramas and police/detective shows round out the top three for types of shows watched most often except for Asians, who would rather catch a sporting event or a cartoon.
There are more differences for radio formats listened to most often:
Top 3 Radio Formats
| Hispanics |
African American/Blacks |
Asians |
White/Caucasians |
| Rock |
R&B |
Rock |
Rock |
| Latin/Hispanic |
Hip-Hop |
Top 40/Pop |
Oldies |
| Hip-Hop |
Religious |
News |
Country |
|
Source: BIGresearch SIMM 11, May 2008
Although cell phones are the form of new media used most for all segments, with 57% of Hispanics, 53% of African Americans, 53.9% of Asians and 49.4% of Whites regularly using, the similarities stop there.
According to the analysis, minorities have a higher regular usage of new media than Whites across all media types. They are more likely to use iPods, text on cell phones, play video games, use video/picture phones, instant messaging online and watch videos on cell phones.
Top 3 New Media (Regular Usage)
| Hispanics |
African American/Blacks |
Asians |
White/Caucasians |
| Cell Phone |
Cell Phone |
Cell Phone |
Cell Phone |
| IPOD/MP3 Player |
Text Messaging |
Instant Messaging |
Tivo/Replay TV/DVR |
| Text Messaging |
Video Gaming |
IPOD/MP3 Player |
Video Gaming |
|
Source: BIGresearch SIMM 11, May 2008
Gary Drenik, President of BIGresearch, said "... Minorities are using new media in higher percentages, providing... unique opportunities to create specific marketing plans that integrate non-traditional media options into their digital ad strategy."
Differences among the various ethnic groups are apparent in how they use the Internet for fun and entertainment. Shopping tops the list for African Americans (40%), Asians (43.7%) and Whites (43.1%); whereas Hispanics would slightly rather check out movie news (42.7%).
Top 3 Online Activities for Fun & Entertainment
| Hispanics |
African American/Blacks |
Asians |
White/Caucasians |
| Movie News |
Shopping |
Shopping |
Shopping |
| Shopping |
Movie News |
Movie News |
Weather |
| Video Games |
TV News |
IM/Chat |
View Photos |
|
Source: BIGresearch SIMM 11, May 2008
The BIGresearch Simultaneous Media Survey data is used by marketers to develop consumer-centric marketing plans to help increase ROI.
Back to top
TBS Is Down with Def Jam to Hype ‘House of Payne’
Promo Xtra
May 27, 2008
TBS is playing for viral viewership response for its second season of “House of Payne” based on buzz about an original song from Def Jam Recordings’ Chrisette Michele in a music video featuring the show’s cast.
The 60-second music video, showing the cast doing what’s been dubbed ‘The House of Payne Shuffle,’ debuted last Thursday during the TBS screening of “Diary of a Mad Black Woman.” The video also has a presence on several Web sites, including www.TBS.com, www.defjam.com and Michele’s MySpace page in a campaign TBS is expecting will generate significant viral momentum.
“We think there’s a great sharing factor that will happen virally with the music video,” Vicky Free, vice president of marketing for TNT, TBS and TCM, said.
Free said TBS was exploring ways to leverage Michele’s tune, “I Gotta Love Jones,” which will be the accompaniment to a summer-long campaign promoting upcoming episodes.
Four new “House of Payne” episodes will run back-to-back for the African-American family sitcom’s season primetime debut on June 4. A two-minute, thirty-second video about the making of the music video hits movie theaters around the country on June 6.
Free said the campaign’s objective is to energize the show’s core fan base and entice new viewers to watch.
“It really is tapping into the fans’ passion for the show and breathing some new promotional energy into the show,” she said.
Feedback from self-described ‘super-fans’ of the series fueled TBS’s deal with Def Jam, since those core viewers said they like Michele’s music.
The music video will get airplay on all Turner networks, including CNN, with frequency in programming that draws a large African American audience, such as the National Basketball Association on TNT.
“House of Payne” was last season’s top-rated ad-supported cable sitcom. African Americans comprise 70% of its audience, according to Free, who said TBS believes the sitcom has a broad appeal.
Back to top
H'wood Hits Mark in Targeting Black Auds
Screen Gems Finds Success as Studios Widen Mix of Pics
Variety
February 11, 2008
When Screen Gems released "This Christmas," aimed at a black audience, the reviews were tepid.
"The critics talked about how (the movie) had this 'ridiculous dance sequence,'" says Screen Gems topper Clint Culpepper. "What they don't know – because the movie wasn't made for them – is that this thing called a 'Soul Train' line is such a tradition in African-American homes."
He has a point: The $13 million movie went on to quietly rake in $49.1 million at the box office.
Screen Gems, which originally made its name with horror and sci fi pics, and other studio labels are finding success with movies tailored to black audiences. But they are doing so by going against the conventional wisdom of the marketplace, and mistaken assumptions of what black viewers want.
In development at Screen Gems, for instance, are a black musical based on Jane Austen's "Emma" and a remake of "The Big Chill" with a black cast.
Those two titles alone diverge from the spate of urban action pics and comedies, especially those starring Tyler Perry, that have done well with black audiences.
In fact, Screen Gems has carved out a niche in producing movies aimed at black moviegoers, finding solid earners if the pictures are made at the right budget level.
They've had success with pics like "Stomp the Yard" and "Breaking All the Rules" – movies often overlooked by major studio divisions – that run in the $4 million-$40 million budget range. "First Sunday," a comedy caper starring Ice Cube, opened on Jan. 11 and has collected $36.8 million to date.
Lionsgate has also concentrated on the cud, with Perry's films continuing to perform strongly.
Other studios court black audiences, although not as frequently. U released the family comedy "Welcome Home Roscoe Jenkins," starring Martin Lawrence, this weekend, and Disney will bow "College Road Trip" next month.
Much rarer are black dramas like "This Christmas." Few movies offer authentic depictions of home life that don't involve crime or gangs – a common complaint among black filmmakers trying to get their projects off the ground.
"They are just normal stories, and (studios) aren't making them. I give (black audiences) stories they want to see. I seem to have been pretty lucky with it," Culpepper says.
There's also an assumption that black films don't travel well overseas: "First Sunday" and "This Christmas" have made a combined $698,381 to date from foreign territories. But that won't sour Screen Gems on films for black cuds. Instead, the label's business model offsets negligible foreign receipts by keeping costs down, particularly marketing spending. In part, they rely on word-of-mouth or "grassroots" promotions as they did with the $4 million-budgeted "The Gospel," which grossed $15.8 million. The campaign borrowed a page from "The Passion of the Christ" and targeted black churches to drum up interest in the film.
"We have to be a lot more innovative," says Screen Gems marketing topper Marc Weinstock. "We don't have the budgets that a normal movie going out on 2,000-plus screens does."
Also on Screen Gems' slate is "Not Easily Broken," starring Morris Chestnut and based on the book by T.D. Jakes, as well as "Lake View Terrace," which centers on an interracial couple harassed by their next-door neighbor, a tightly wound black LAPD officer.
Studios have a history of "discovering" the black audience, ramping up their development slates, then scaling back. The blaxploitation pics of the 1970s spawned a wave of like product. "New Jack City" in the 1990s prompted a wave of crime thrillers.
By contrast, movies like "Waiting to Exhale" and "Soul Food" – dramas that performed well at the box office – have failed to produce waves of similar projects.
"There is a lack of understanding in terms of the people who are in decision-making positions who decide what should go into development," says William Morris' Charles King, who represents Perry, among others. "Seventy-five percent of movies that are targeted at a black demographic make money. That's significantly higher than movies that are made outside of that demo. Those movies are also made on much smaller budgets, so even if they aren't that profitable, the loss isn't that big."
That's why Culpepper earns praise for being one of the few executives in town, along with Lionsgate's Jon Feltheimer, consistently making films aimed at blacks.
"Most of the people making decisions don't understand black culture," director John Singleton says. "They didn't grow up with hip-hop. There are a group of studio executives who do get it – there are one or two at each studio. Clint is one of those executives."
Perhaps Culpepper's Sony bosses – chair-CEO Michael Lynton and co-chair Amy Pascal – deserve credit for bringing black-targeted films to the bigscreen, because the Screen Gems topper enjoys the kind of freedom few executives have. Culpepper dubs Lynton and Pascal "the best parents in the world," who have never said no to a project or budget.
"Try, saying no to Clint. It's impossible," Pascal says.
Back to top
Nearer to Overcoming
Barack Obama's Success Shows that the Ceiling Has Risen for African-Americans. But Many are Still Too Close to the Floor
May 8, 2008
The Economist
When Roland Fryer was about 15, a friend asked him what he would be doing when he was 30. He said he would probably be dead. It was a reasonable prediction. At the time, he was hanging out with a gang and selling drugs on the side. Young black men in that line of work seldom live long. But Mr Fryer survived. At 30, he won tenure as an economics professor at Harvard. That was four months ago.
Mr Fryer's parents split up when he was very young. His father was a maths teacher who went off the rails: young Roland once had to borrow money to bail him out of jail. His great-aunt and great-uncle ran a crack business: young Roland would watch them cook cocaine powder into rocks of crack in a frying pan in the kitchen. Several of his relatives went to prison. But Mr Fryer backed away from a life of crime and won a sports scholarship to the University of Texas. He found he enjoyed studying, and was rather good at it. By the time he was 25, the president of Harvard was hectoring him to join the faculty.
Mr Fryer now applies his supple mind to the touchy, tangled issue of racial inequality. Why are African-Americans so much less prosperous than whites? Why do so many black children flounder in school? Why do so many young black men languish behind bars? Why are stories like Mr Fryer's considered so surprising?
Black and white Americans tend to produce different answers to these questions, and there is also heated disagreement within both groups. Some blacks think their glass is three-quarters full; others think it three-quarters empty. Optimists can point to obvious improvements. Little more than four decades ago, blacks in the South could not vote. This year, a black man may be elected president. Under segregation, southern blacks were barred from white schools, neighbourhoods and opportunities. Now, racial discrimination is both illegal and taboo. Blacks have pierced nearly every glass ceiling. The secretary of state, the boss of American Express and the country's most popular entertainer (Oprah Winfrey) are all black.
Life for the average African-American has also improved remarkably. The median black household income has risen from $22,300 (in 2006 dollars) in 1967 to $32,100 in 2006. Black life expectancy has soared from 34 in 1900 to 73 today. Most blacks today are middle class.
Yes, say the pessimists, but the gap between what blacks and whites earn and what they learn, which narrowed steadily between the 1940s and the late 1980s, has more or less frozen since then. Blacks' median household income is still only 63% of whites'. Academically, black children at 17 perform no better than a white 13-year-old. Blacks die, on average, five years earlier than whites. And though the black middle class has grown immensely, many blacks are still stuck in crime-scorched, nearly jobless ghettos.
What ails black America? Public debate falls between two poles. Some academics and most civil-rights activists stress the role played by racial discrimination. It may no longer be overt, they argue, but it is still widespread and severe. Julian Bond of the National Association for the Advancement of Coloured People reckons that racism is still “epidemic” in America.
Black conservatives, while never denying that racism persists, think it much less severe than before and no longer the main obstacle to black advancement. Bill Cosby, a veteran comedian, tours the country urging blacks to concentrate on improving themselves: to study hard, to work hard and—especially—to shun the culture of despair that grips the ghetto.
The debate is often bitter. Michael Eric Dyson, a leftish academic, argues that the black middle class has “lost its mind” if it believes Mr Cosby's argument downplaying the importance of race. Larry Elder, a conservative pundit, wrote a book about blacks who blame racism for nearly everything called: “Stupid Black Men”.
Mr Fryer eschews histrionics in favour of hard data. He is obsessed with education, which he calls “the civil-rights battleground of the 21st century”. Why do blacks lag behind whites in school? Mr Fryer is prepared to test even the most taboo proposition. Are blacks genetically predisposed to be less intelligent than whites? With a collaborator from the University of Chicago, Mr Fryer debunked this idea. Granted, blacks score worse than whites on intelligence tests. But Mr Fryer looked at data from new tests on very young children. At eight months to a year, he found almost no racial gap, and that gap disappeared entirely when he added controls for such things as low birth weight.
If the gap is absent in babies, this suggests it is caused by environmental factors, which can presumably be fixed. But first they must be identified. Do black children need better nutrition? More stimulation in the home? Better schools? Probably all these things matter, but how much? “I don't know,” says Mr Fryer. It is a phrase that, to his credit, he uses often.
Cool to be dumb
His most striking contribution to the debate so far has been to show that black students who study hard are accused of “acting white” and are ostracised by their peers. Teachers have known this for years, at least anecdotally. Mr Fryer found a way to measure it. He looked at a large sample of public-school children who were asked to name their friends. To correct for kids exaggerating their own popularity, he counted a friendship as real only if both parties named each other. He found that for white pupils, the higher their grades, the more popular they were. But blacks with good grades had fewer black friends than their mediocre peers. In other words, studiousness is stigmatised among black schoolchildren. It would be hard to imagine a more crippling cultural norm.
Mr Fryer has some novel ideas about fixing this state of affairs. New York's school system is letting him test a couple of them on its children. One is to give pupils cash incentives. If a nine-year-old completes an exam, he gets $5. For getting the answers right, he gets more money, up to about $250 a year. The notion of bribing children to study makes many parents queasy. Mr Fryer's response is: let's see if it works and drop it if it doesn't.
Another idea, being tested on a different group of children, is to hand out free mobile telephones. The phones do not work during school hours, and children can recharge them with call-minutes only by studying. (The phone companies were happy to help with this.) The phones give the children an incentive to study, and Mr Fryer a means to communicate with them. He talks of “re-branding” academic achievement to make it cool. He knows it will not be easy. He recalls hearing drug-pushers in the 1980s joking “Just say no!” as they handed over the goods, mocking Nancy Reagan's anti-drug slogan.
Blacks who do well in school are hungrily recruited by universities, which often admit them with lower test scores than are required of whites or Asians. The bar was first lowered for blacks out of a sense that America owes them a debt for past discrimination. Now universities are more likely to argue that racial diversity is valuable for its own sake.
But racial preferences are unpopular among whites, and the most blatant ones are, increasingly, illegal. The University of Michigan used to give applicants more points for being black than for getting a perfect score on the entrance exam. The Supreme Court deemed this unconstitutional in 2003, but ruled that less explicit preferences might be allowable.
When voters are asked if they want to ban racial preferences in the public sphere, they generally say yes. Since the 1990s, three states have passed referendums barring racial preferences, and four more may do so in November. Opponents of racial preferences argue that they are bad for blacks, too.
A study by Richard Sander of the University of California, Los Angeles, found that when the bar is lowered for black applicants to law school, they are admitted to institutions where they cannot cope. Many who drop out of top-tier colleges might have thrived at slightly less competitive ones. Mr Sander calculated that the net effect of pro-black preferences was actually to reduce the number of blacks who passed the bar exam. That is, racial preferences for black law students result in fewer black lawyers. John McWhorter, the author of “Winning the Race: Beyond the Crisis in Black America”, argues that lowering the bar for blacks also reduces their incentive to excel at school. “As long as black students have to do only so well, they will do only so well,” he says.
For every dollar that a white man earns, a black man makes only 70 cents. Such figures are sometimes bandied around to imply that nearly all of this gap is caused by discrimination. That is bunk. If a firm could really get the same work done 30% more cheaply simply by hiring blacks, someone would have noticed and made a fortune doing just that.
That said, blacks certainly face barriers in the job market. Two economists, Marianne Bertrand and Sendhil Mullainathan, sent out 5,000 replies to job advertisements in Boston and Chicago. Each fictitious applicant was randomly assigned either a black-sounding name, such as Jamal or Lakisha, or a white one, such as Emily or Greg. For every ten jobs the “whites” applied for, they were offered one interview. The “blacks” had to post 15 letters to elicit the same response. Clearly, some managers are racist. But many are not. And many firms are desperate to hire and promote blacks, if only to avoid lawsuits.
The short straw
Looked at more closely, the statistics are murky. White men are more likely to work than black men. The proportion of black men participating in the labour force fell from 74% in 1972 to 67% last year. Whites start more businesses, too. Only 5% of firms are black-owned, though blacks account for 13% of America's population.
A black woman with a degree earns as much as a white woman with a degree. But with a professional degree, the black woman earns 30% more (see chart 2). That does not prove that law firms discriminate in favour of black women—though they may. Another explanation is that a skilled white woman is more likely to have a rich husband (or indeed any husband), and so may have less incentive to maximise her earnings.
Even when blacks earn as much as whites, the whites are typically far wealthier. In 2000 the average white household in the bottom fifth of income-earners had net assets of $24,000. The figure for blacks was a piffling $57. Whites in the middle fifth were five times wealthier than their black counterparts.
Partly this is because whites inherit more. But it is also because of different approaches to investment. Blacks are more likely to put their money in the bank, notes Mr Fryer. Whites are more likely to invest in shares, which generate higher returns. Compound this over a couple of generations and the effect is colossal.
Another crucial factor is the collapse of the black family. The proportion of black babies born out of wedlock has nearly doubled since 1970, to 69%. And 70% of these births are to mothers who are truly alone, not cohabiting. Stable two-parent families accumulate wealth more easily than single-parent homes. Two salaries stretch further, two pairs of hands mean less need for paid child care. Two-parent families also find it easier to raise well-adjusted, studious children, who go on to start stable families of their own. Broken families, if middle class, find it harder to stay that way. And if they start in the ghetto, they find it harder to break out.
“Black life is not valued!” booms Michael Walrond, a popular pastor in Harlem. He is referring to the news that three police officers were acquitted of all charges after shooting dead an unarmed black man, Sean Bell, a few hours before his wedding. The cops fired 50 bullets, but the pastor says he is outraged by the figure of 31. Members of his mostly black flock know immediately what he means. Two of the officers were black and all of them thought Mr Bell had a gun. But it was the white officer who reloaded and fired 31 rounds. Mr Walrond's angry sermon draws cheers.
Afterwards, in his office, he agrees that it is not only whites who devalue black lives: black criminals do too. Mr Walrond, like many inner-city clerics, works hard to reform those who stray. But like Barack Obama's former pastor, Jeremiah Wright, he tends to assume the worst about his country. He finds Mr Wright's theory that the government concocted the AIDS virus to kill blacks “credible”.
He refers to the Tuskegee experiment between 1932 and 1972 when some doctors in Alabama deliberately neglected to treat black syphilis patients in order to study the disease's progression. That was an abomination. But it is hardly evidence that the government is bent on genocide.
From alienation to despair
Is the state racist? Those who think so often point to the criminal-justice system. A startling 11% of black males aged 20-34 are behind bars. Overall, black men are seven times more likely to be incarcerated than white men. Until recently, sentences for crack offenders (who are mostly black) were much harsher than those for powder-cocaine offenders (mostly white). Ex-convicts in several states are barred from voting, a penalty that deters no crime but signals to wrongdoers that they can never be full citizens again. “We are becoming a nation of jailers, and racist jailers at that,” reckons Glenn Loury, an economist.
Not so, says Heather Mac Donald of the Manhattan Institute, a conservative think-tank. Blacks are more likely to be jailed because they commit more crimes, she argues. In 2005 the black murder rate was seven times higher than that for whites and Latinos combined. Harsh crack laws account only for a smidgeon of the disparity in incarceration rates. In 2006 blacks were 37.5% of state prisoners; exclude drug offenders and that figure drops to 37%. And since black criminals' victims are mostly black, some argue that locking more of them up has saved many black lives.
In other ways, it is far from clear that the government is trying to keep blacks down. Affirmative-action policies mean that it provides jobs for a disproportionate number of them. It also allows blacks who own small businesses to charge 10% more than whites and still win federal contracts. “Small” is generously defined. A firm with 1,500 employees can qualify. Its black owner can be worth $750,000—excluding his home and business—and still be deemed “economically disadvantaged”.
Yet many blacks feel alienated in a way that is “vastly disproportionate to real-life stimulus,” frets Mr McWhorter. When New Orleans flooded, some speculated that the government had blown up the levees. Even cooler heads believed that the botched response stemmed from George Bush's indifference to black suffering.
Alienation has consequences. Amid the revolutionary fervour of the 1960s, says Mr McWhorter, many blacks learned that “America's racism rendered it unworthy of any self-regarding black person's embrace and that therefore blacks were exempt from mainstream standards of conduct.” The conventional wisdom about ghettos—best expressed in William Julius Wilson's book “When Work Disappears”—is that inner cities decayed because factories moved away. But the jobs often moved only a couple of bus rides away. Noting that millions of blacks moved halfway across the country to find work during the “great migration” in the early 20th century, Mr McWhorter wonders why so many of their descendants failed to follow suit.
He offers two explanations. First, a huge expansion of open-ended welfare in the 1960s enabled mothers to subsist without work. Until the mid-1990s, welfare often paid better than an entry-level job. Second, the counter-culture taught young blacks that working for “chump change” was beneath their dignity.
Bill Clinton fixed welfare and pushed millions of jobless women into work. Violent crime has also fallen sharply since the 1990s, despite the best efforts of gangster rappers to glorify it. Previously dysfunctional cities, such as New York and Washington, DC, are now soberly governed and better places to live in.
Yet many African-Americans are intensely gloomy. In a poll last year, only 44% said they expected life for blacks to get better, down from 57% in 1986. The subprime mortgage crisis, which will cost many black families their homes this year, will surely deepen the gloom.
Some blacks contend that racism has simply gone underground. Ellis Cose, a journalist, once wrote that even middle-class blacks suffer constant subtle racial slights, and that these are so distressing that they “are in the end most of what life is”. Other blacks think he exaggerates. Sometimes, says Mr McWhorter, the assistant trailing you in a store is just trying to sell you something.
If Barack Obama can only...
Taking the longer view, there is much to cheer. In every way that can be measured (a big caveat), racism has diminished in the past two generations. Inter-racial marriages are up sevenfold since 1970. Young Americans are far less likely to express racial animosity than their elders, suggesting that as old bigots die, they will not be replaced. And if Mr Obama becomes president, it would “raise the ceiling for everyone,” says Robert Franklin, the president of Morehouse, a black college in Atlanta.
“For me, racism is not going to be an obstacle,” says DeWayne Powell, a student at Morehouse. He recalls an incident when, en route to drop off his college application, he stopped to ask for directions. A white receptionist asked sneeringly whether he could read. “I laughed,” he says. “I thought: I'm on my way to fulfil my destiny, and you're stuck behind that glass.”
Back to top
Next in Line
African American Filmmakers Are Ready with Stories to Tell. They're Arriving Behind Trailblazers, But Lately, The Going Has Been a Bit Tricky.
March 30, 2008
Los Angeles Times
For many, it was more than just a low-budget romantic comedy about a sexually liberated woman – it was the first shot in a cinematic revolution.
With his 1986 breakout film, "She's Gotta Have it," director Spike Lee unwittingly kicked open the door for a new wave of young independent African American filmmakers armed with audacious visions and fresh perspectives about black life. Robert Townsend ("Hollywood Shuffle"), the Hughes brothers ("Menace II Society"), Mario Van Peebles ("New Jack City"), Charles Burnett ("To Sleep With Anger"), Matty Rich ("Straight Out of Brooklyn"), John Singleton ("Boyz N the Hood") and others won over not only black moviegoers but wider audiences as well, creating comedies and dramas barbed with sharp perspectives on race, class, social conditions and politics.
But now, more than 20 years later, and in a time when race has taken center stage in presidential politics, another type of African American filmmaker has established himself as the dominant voice. With "Meet the Browns," which made more than $20 million when it opened last week, Tyler Perry has cemented his status as Hollywood's most consistently successful independent black filmmaker. Urban audiences have lined up in droves to enjoy his traditional formula of romantic, family-centered melodrama – spiced with over-the-top, insult-hurling characters – which he honed years ago writing plays aimed at black churchgoers.
Despite the film's popularity and its message of faith, family togetherness and perseverance against seemingly overwhelming odds, the celebration within the African American creative community has been muted, its volume registering several notches below the joyous acclaim that once greeted Lee and his contemporaries.
In fact, Perry's popularity – and the images he has presented, particularly Madea, the gun-toting, trash-talking grandmother portrayed by Perry wearing a dress and heavy makeup – has ignited a debate among participants and observers of the black film scene.
If Lee laid the groundwork for a diverse army of black creators, then Perry has had the opposite effect, according to several experienced and aspiring African American filmmakers who want to tell dramatic, personal stories with complexity, and without bawdy humor, broad characters or facile resolutions.
They contend they are all dressed up with no place to show, all but shut out by studios who have embraced the Perry formula, as well as comedies such as "Who's Your Caddy?" or the youth-oriented frolics "You Got Served," "Stomp the Yard" and "How She Move."
"We want to tell multidimensional stories with in-depth characters," said D'Angela Steed, one of the heads of Strange Fruit Media, which produces films and television series (BET's "Exalted!"). The company recently pitched a made-for-TV drama to a cable network. The response? "What's the Tyler Perry version?"
Nia Hill, Steed's partner, added that the situation extends beyond just a lack of opportunity. "The images that are being put forth are too powerful to be taken lightly."
But others in the industry proclaim that the African American film landscape is not only alive but thriving. They say several filmmakers, including Perry, Tim Story ("Barbershop," the "Fantastic Four" movies), David E. Talbert ("First Sunday") and others have tapped into commercial sensibilities and have taken advantage of increased opportunities.
"The producers and people I talk to are thrilled by the success of Tyler and the opportunities this has presented for other filmmakers," said Charles King, an agent with the William Morris Agency who represents Perry, Story, director Craig Brewer ("Hustle & Flow") and Andre Benjamin, actor ("Idlewild") and member of the rap group OutKast. "It really shows there's a marketplace that's not being fed."
A harder road?
Black film festivals around that country are where up-and-coming movie-makers meet to share projects and ideas. This next wave of black filmmakers is an amorphous group, perhaps less easily categorized than those who followed Lee. Though united in their goal to make artistic statements that will draw audiences (and financial success), they differ greatly in backgrounds and perspective. All have personal stories or insights about family, life and love that they want to share. Some are industry veterans who want to make their own mark after years working as publicists or in other jobs. Some are actors who want to create more satisfying roles than those they are being offered.
And they are trying to make headway in an industry that's almost impenetrable for independent filmmakers of any race. But some black filmmakers feel they face a harder challenge in getting their voices seen and heard, especially during this time dominated by Perry and his distinct sensibility. They say they have hit resistance in trying to create universal stories with specific and realistic black characters that would be the equivalent of "Juno," "Little Miss Sunshine" and "Sideways."
Ava Duvernay, who has scored accolades and awards for her debut short film, "Saturday Night Life," and a documentary about an underground club that was an early venue for hip-hop, "This Is the Life," says she has experienced roadblocks at studios when pitching her script for a romantic drama called "The Middle of Nowhere," about a woman whose life is turned upside down when her husband is imprisoned, even though Phylicia Rashad ("The Cosby Show") and Sanaa Lathan ("Love & Basketball") are attached to the project.
Actor Reginald T. Dorsey, who is seeking distributing for "Kings of the Evening," a drama set in the Great Depression that he helped produce and was a hit at the recent Pan African Film Festival, said studios and backers often tell him and other black filmmakers that the financial risks in investing in projects without a high concept or a major star outweigh the benefits and that there is little international interest in small black films. "It's like a slap in the face," he said. "My movie is more than just a black film. It's about where you're from and what you know."
New York University film school graduate Caran Hartsfield said she has been trying to get financing and distribution for a comedic drama, "Bury Me Standing," for the last year and a half. The script, about four family members and their differing reactions to the death of a relative, has drawn interest from Alfre Woodard ("Desperate Housewives"), Mos Def ("Be Kind Rewind") and Katt Williams ("First Sunday").
"When it comes to Hollywood, there's been all this hemming and hawing," Hartsfield said. "They'll say, 'Oh, we love the script,' but it makes people nervous because it's a black drama. It doesn't fit within the formula; it makes them nervous."
Said actor-director Van Peebles, who bounces between working on his own projects ("Baadasssss!") and appearing and directing TV series ("Damages," "Law & Order"): "It's not that we shouldn't have our Tyler Perrys or that we don't want to laugh. But we don't have our 'A Beautiful Mind' or 'Lost in Translation.' The lack of variety gets to be reductive. In Hollywood, there are only so many slots that are going to be filled by African Americans. It's all about what the dominant culture feels is making money at the time. Are there still cinematic minstrel shows? Absolutely."
Seeing opportunity
Still, some surveying the black film scene say that those who feel creatively stifled are seeing only one side of the picture.
Said agent Charles King: "Studios emulate what is successful. I don't think it's specific to the success of Tyler. It shows that family-themed comedic vehicles with African American characters are being embraced by a wide audience."
Kent Faulcon, an actor who has written and directed a thriller about a small-town teacher and a hit man called "Sister's Keeper," agreed. "I feel that there's room for me and those who are bringing something new. The response I've gotten has been overwhelming. I'm not discouraged. I feel enthused – there's a hunger there."
Clint Culpepper, the head of Sony's Screen Gems, added, "We admire Tyler, but we don't need to copy him. He's the best at what he does, and he's fulfilling that. We want to make movies that people want to see." The studio is developing several culturally based films, including an African American version of "The Big Chill" and a version of Jane Austen's "Emma" in an urban setting.
Screen Gems has been working on several of the projects with Rainforest Films, a black-owned production company. The Atlanta-based producers have been the key force behind several profitable urban-oriented films, including "The Gospel," "Stomp the Yard" and last year's holiday hit, "This Christmas," which many critics felt had a Perry-style vibe.
"All ships rise and fall with the tide, and this is a very good time to be a black filmmaker," said Will Packer, who runs Rainforest Films with his partner Rob Hardy and whose next project, "Obsessed," stars Beyonce Knowles as the wife of a businessman (Idris Elba) who learns her husband is being stalked by a temp worker in his office (Ali Larter from "Heroes"). "I can understand the frustration, that black people are more than Tyler Perry. But you have to understand how Hollywood works, and that when there is that kind of success, other people take note."
Perry's robust output also fuels the debate. "Meet the Browns" is his second film in less than six months ("Why Did I Get Married" was released last October) and is the first of his five films to feature an Oscar-nominated actress (Angela Bassett).
"In many ways, Tyler is to be saluted," said Melvin Donaldson, author of "Black Directors in Hollywood." "He created this niche for himself, using large churches to build on his interest in presenting positivity, a sense of family and faith."
But Todd Boyd, professor of critical studies at USC, called the films "cooning. He's really done more damage than good to the image of black people."
The tastes of African American audiences toward more serious fare further complicate the issue. "Akeelah and the Bee," "Talk to Me" and "The Great Debaters," dramas that featured major stars such as Denzel Washington, Don Cheadle, Bassett and Laurence Fishburne, won critical accolades but were not huge hits with black filmgoers.
Burnett, the director of the 1977 portrait of a working-class Watts neighborhood, "Killer of Sheep," which is considered a landmark of American independent film, put much of the dissatisfaction over the current black film landscape on the shoulders of audiences.
"Trying to get black people to go see 'The Great Debaters' was like pulling teeth," said Burnett, who is seeking distribution for his latest film, "Namibia: The Struggle for Liberation," about the long battle waged by the African country for independence. "Our own people don't support stories that make a difference, stories that support the independent spirit."
But observers pointed out that those films were largely marketed to art-house and general audiences, bypassing promotion in black communities. And prominent insiders downplay the dominance of Perry, saying there is plenty of room for black projects.
"Right now there isn't that balance," said Donaldson. "But I think the audience is there, and they're ready for diversity."
Back to top
Trends Point The Way To Goji Berries, Gluten-Free Comestibles
Marketing Daily
May 8, 2008
What's the big deal with gluten? And what is it, anyway? Who cares – you don't need it, and soon you'll know that. Gluten-free is just one of several new food trends that the Center for Culinary Development (CCD) says is going to show up in greater quantity on store shelves and restaurants – including the fast kind – in coming years.
The San Francisco-based product development company just published a retrospective look at food trends since 2004 that charts the appearance and popular growth of foods and food additives. The group's "Culinary Trend Mapping" report says future trends can be extrapolated from current products like green tea, pomegranate, sea salt or chipotle. Such products, says the group, start out as an exotic or niche offering in ethnic foods, and them move into the mainstream in five stages, based on consumer demand for health foods, ethnic variety and premium products.
Kara Nielsen, trend analyst for CCD, says the group charts evolution in a food's popularity on a five-stage chart. "Stage one is something we see in fine dining or ethnic food," she says, adding that stage two is specialty-food-oriented retail and media channels, like Gourmet Magazine and stores like Sur La Table. Stage three would find the item in mainstream restaurants like Applebee's or Chili's, and retail stores targeting recreational cooks. Stage four finds such products getting general market coverage in family and women's magazines. Finally, by Stage five the product would be showing up on grocery shelves or in fast-food menus either as a stand-alone product, flavoring or functional food.
Nielsen says health and wellness, ethnic foods and premium foods are broad categories under which reside market drivers like convenience, artisan food or natural foods.
Among emerging trends: Goji berries, non-functional foods (additives one sees only on the label) and the above-mentioned gluten-free SKUs (restaurants like P.F. Chang's, and Outback Steak House are, per Nielsen, offering gluten-free menu items.) Another emerging trend: "hue-trition" in which foods are touted for their healthful properties based on color. "Purple beverages, for example," says Nielsen. "Blueberries, black currants, and green tea as a functional ingredient in things like oatmeal and cereal."
Other health and wellness products that have gained a foothold in the U.S. market are Roobios, which appeared on the scene in 2006; yerba mate; guarana and acai. Among ethnic foods, bubble tea, lemongrass, edamame, and dulce de leche – all of which appeared in 2004 or 2005 – are gaining quick acceptance.
If pho, sambal, Manchego cheese, quinoa, yuzu, mole, and soba noodles don't ring a bell, it is because – per CCD – they have hit a speed bump at stage two.
Nielsen says the group expects future trends to include mood foods, foods that offer satiety via artificial fillers. Among the ethnic foods, Vietnamese food, Moroccan and generally North African food will grow in popularity.
Healthy lifestyle products will continue to be the most dominant driver of food choices, with new "superfruit" products like mangosteen now entering the U.S. market partly because of changes in import rules. Other fruits, such as Brazilian Capuacu, along with high antioxidants, omega three, and high-fiber products will multiply in the U.S., per CCD.
Back to top
Is U.S. Innovation Headed Offshore?
Apparently Not, Even Though More Research and Development Is Joining Manufacturing in the Shift toward Low-Cost Nations
Business Week
May 7, 2008
To those worried about America's ability to compete in the 21st century, the trend is alarming: Just as key manufacturing industries fled offshore in the 1970s and '80s, U.S. companies are now shifting more engineering and design work to low-cost nations such as China, India, and Russia. Surely, innovation itself must follow.
Apparently not, according to a new study published by the National Academies, the Washington organization that advises the U.S. government on science and technology policy. The 371-page report titled Innovation in Global Industries argues that, in sectors from software and semiconductors to biotech and logistics, America's lead in creating new products and services has remained remarkably resilient over the past decade – even as more research and development by U.S. companies is done offshore.
"This is a good sign," says Georgetown University Associate Strategy Professor Jeffrey T. Macher, who co-edited the study with David C. Mowery of the University of California at Berkeley. "It means most of the value added is going to U.S. firms, and they are able to reinvest those profits in innovation."
The report, a collection of papers by leading academics assessing the impact of globalization on inventive activity in 10 industries, won't reassure all skeptics that the globalization of production and R&D is good for the U.S. One drawback is that most of the conclusions are based on old data: In some cases the most recent numbers are from 2002.
Exporting the Benefits?
And while the authors of the report make compelling cases that U.S. companies are doing just fine, thank you, none of the writers addresses today's burning question: Is American tech supremacy thanks to heavy investments in R&D also benefiting U.S. workers? Or are U.S. inventions mainly creating jobs overseas? A few years ago, most people took it for granted that what was good for companies was good for the greater economy. But the flat growth in living standards for most Americans during the last boom has raised doubts over the benefits of globalization.
"Innovation shouldn't be an end in itself for U.S. policy," says trade theorist Ralph E. Gomory, a research professor at New York University's Stern School of Business. "I think we have to address whether a country can run on innovation. If you just do R&D to enhance economic activity in other countries, you are getting very little out of it." Gomory, a former top IBM executive, retired in 2007 as president of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, which funded the National Academies study.
Still, given all the debate over offshoring, the report's central findings are interesting. The authors marshal a wealth of evidence to show that, thanks to innovation, globalization hasn't eroded U.S. leadership even in some industries where there has been a substantial offshore shift in engineering and design.
Despite an explosion of outsourcing to India and Ireland, for example, America's software industry still trumps the rest of the world in exports of packaged software and services, patent activity, and venture capital investment. The U.S. also accounts for 90% of chip-design patents—the same level as 1991—although Asian companies now do most of manufacturing. And when it comes to biotechnology, the U.S. is way ahead, luring more venture capital than all other countries combined.
America First
The U.S. even remains a heavyweight in personal computers, the study says, though China and Taiwan manufacture most of the hardware. That's because the real innovation and profits still belong to companies like Microsoft and Intel, makers of the operating system and central processors, while U.S. brands command 40% of the global market and still define breakthrough design.
There are cases where the U.S. can lose a commanding lead when domestic manufacturing disappears – namely in flat-panel displays and lighting. Macher also concedes "there are problems on the horizon" regarding America's future competitiveness. Other nations are starting to mimic many of the strategies that give the U.S. an innovation edge, for example. And as Asians grow richer "they are becoming more sophisticated and demanding than Americans as users of many tech products."
But for now, "all evidence is that our position in many of these industries will continue," says Macher. Why is the U.S. so entrenched? One reason, he says, is simply that U.S. corporations are proving very adept at managing global R&D networks while keeping core innovation at home. While innovative activity in chips and software is growing fast elsewhere, it has not yet been enough to close the gap with the U.S.
The fact that the U.S. remains by far the world's most lucrative market for pharmaceuticals and business software helps explain its continued strength in those industries. What's more, industry clusters involving companies, universities, and venture capital are so well-established – such as San Diego and Cambridge, Mass., in biotech – that it will take many years for other nations to replicate them.
Persistent Worries
Despite the impressive volume of data, however, the National Academies study is unlikely to allay completely fears that U.S. supremacy in innovation is under threat. The old data, for example, are fine in the academic world, which prizes the reliability and consistency of data over timeliness and where research papers take eons to wend through the peer-review process.
But the real boom in offshore R&D in Asia and Eastern Europe has occurred in the past six years, when multinationals began hiring engineers and designers by the thousands and signing major outsourcing deals with foreign engineering houses. Visit the huge Indian labs of companies like General Electric, Texas Instruments, IBM, Cisco, and Motorola, for example, and you'll find many examples of Indian engineers developing important next-generation products for global markets. In the pharmaceutical industry, Merck, Eli Lilly, Forest Laboratories, Wyeth, Bristol-Myers Squibb and others have struck alliances to collaborate with Indian companies on major drug-discovery programs since 2005.
Most authors of the papers in the study acknowledge their data aren't perfect. But they contend that even the growth in offshore R&D in the past few years probably isn't enough to change the big picture about where important innovation is taking place—and who profits from it.
It is probably true that American companies are the biggest winners from the globalization of R&D. But if the aim is to rally national support for dramatic increases in federal spending for science and technology in the name of boosting American competitiveness, the next studies on the topic may need to go further. The deeper question is whether U.S. leadership in innovation still creates wealth for average Americans, not just corporate shareholders and top executives.
Back to top
Does Being Ethical Pay?
Companies Spend Huge Amounts of Money To Be 'Socially Responsible.' Do Consumers Reward Them For It? And How Much?
The Wall Street Journal
May 12, 2008
For corporations, social responsibility has become a big business. Companies spend billions of dollars doing good works – everything from boosting diversity in their ranks to developing eco-friendly technology – and then trumpeting those efforts to the public.
But does it pay off?
Many companies hope consumers will pay a premium for products made with higher ethical standards. But most companies plunge in without testing that assumption or some other crucial questions. Will buyers actually reward good corporate behavior by paying more for products – and will they punish irresponsible behavior by paying less? If so, how much? And just how far does a company really need to go to win people over?
To find out, we conducted a series of experiments. We showed consumers the same products – coffee and T-shirts – but told one group the items had been made using high ethical standards and another group that low standards had been used. A control group got no information.
In all of our tests, consumers were willing to pay a slight premium for the ethically made goods. But they went much further in the other direction: They would buy unethically made products only at a steep discount.
What's more, consumer attitudes played a big part in shaping those results. People with high standards for corporate behavior rewarded the ethical companies with bigger premiums and punished the unethical ones with bigger discounts.
Finally, we discovered that companies don't necessarily need to go all-out with social responsibility to win over consumers. If a company invests in even a small degree of ethical production, buyers will reward it just as much as a company that goes much further in its efforts.
Below, we'll look at these tests in more detail. But first, a definition – and a caveat.
For our purposes, "ethically produced" goods are those manufactured under three conditions. First, the company is considered to have progressive stakeholder relations, such as a commitment to diversity in hiring and consumer safety. Second, it must follow progressive environmental practices, such as using eco-friendly technology. Finally, it must be seen to demonstrate respect for human rights – no child labor or forced labor in overseas factories, for instance.
Now the warning, which may not come as much of a surprise. Even though we think ethical production can lead to higher sales, not all consumers will be won over by the efforts. Some may prefer a lower price even if they know a product is made unethically.
With that in mind, here's a closer look at our results.
How Much Are Ethics Worth?
Our first experiment asked two questions. How much more will people pay for an ethically produced product? And how much less are they willing to spend for one they think is unethical?
To test these questions, we gathered a random group of 97 adult coffee drinkers and asked them how much they would pay for a pound of beans from a certain company. We used a brand that's not available in North America, so none of the participants would be familiar with it.
But before the people answered, we asked them to read some information about the company's production standards. One group got positive ethical information, and one group negative; the control group got neutral information, similar to what shoppers would typically know in a store.
After reading about the company and its coffee, the people told us the price they were willing to pay on an 11-point scale, from $5 to $15. The results? The mean price for the ethical group ($9.71 per pound) was significantly higher than that of the control group ($8.31) or the unethical group ($5.89).
Meanwhile, as the numbers show, the unethical group was demanding to pay significantly less for the product than the control group. In fact, the unethical group punished the coffee company's bad behavior more than the ethical group rewarded its good behavior. The unethical group's mean price was $2.42 below the control group's, while the ethical group's mean price was $1.40 above. So, negative information had almost twice the impact of positive information on the participants' willingness to pay.
For companies, the implications of this study – albeit limited – are apparent. Efforts to move toward ethical production, and promote that behavior, appear to be a wise investment. In other words, if you act in a socially responsible manner, and advertise that fact, you may be able to charge slightly more for your products.
On the other hand, it appears to be even more important to stay away from goods that are unethically produced. Consumers may still purchase your products, but only at a substantial discount.
How Ethical Do You Need To Be?
Our next test looked at degrees of ethical behavior. For instance, are consumers willing to pay more for a product that is 100% ethically produced versus one that is 50% or 25% ethically produced?
To find out, we tested consumers' responses to T-shirts from a fictitious manufacturer. We divided 218 people into five groups and presented them with information about the company and its product. One group was told the shirts were 100% organic cotton, one group 50% and one group 25%. Another group – the "unethical" one – was told there was no organic component. The control group got no information.
In addition, all the groups but the control were shown a short paragraph detailing the detrimental effects of nonorganic cotton production on the environment.
Then the participants were asked how much they were willing to pay for the shirts on a 16-point scale, ranging from $15 to $30. As in the first test, we found that people were willing to pay a premium for all levels of ethical production, and they would discount an unethical product more deeply than they would reward an ethical one.
But consumers didn't reward increasing levels of ethical production with increasing price premiums. The 25% organic shirts got a mean price of $20.72 – not much different from the 50% ($20.44) and 100% ($21.21).
It seems that once companies hit a certain ethical threshold, consumers will reward them by paying higher prices for their products. Any ethical acts past that point might reinforce the company's image, but don't make people willing to pay more. (Of course, if 100% ethical becomes expected among consumers, anything less may be punished.)
What Effect Do Consumer Attitudes Have?
In our final experiment, we looked at the attitudes people bring to the table. If consumers expect that companies will behave ethically, will that change how much they reward and punish behavior? What if they expect that companies are just in it for the money, maximizing profits and not taking ethics into account?
Once again, we tested coffee drinkers – 84 this time – and split them into groups that received positive, negative and no ethical information about the manufacturer and its methods. But first we measured the people's attitudes toward corporations and labeled them high-expectation or low-expectation.
Once again we found that – regardless of their expectations – consumers were willing to pay more for ethical goods than unethical ones, or ones about which they had no information. Likewise, negative information had a much bigger bearing on consumer response than positive information. People punished unethical goods with a bigger discount (about $2 below the control group) than they rewarded ethical ones with premiums (about $1 above the control group).
So, what effect did consumer attitudes have? People with high expectations doled out bigger rewards and punishments than those with low expectations. Those with high expectations were willing to pay a mean of $11.59 per pound for the ethical coffee, versus $9.90 for those with low expectations. And the high-expectations group punished the unethical coffee with a price of $6.92, versus $8.44 for low-expectations consumers.
The lessons are clear. Companies should segment their market and make a particular effort to reach out to buyers with high ethical standards, because those are the customers who can deliver the biggest potential profits on ethically produced goods.
Back to top
Study: Gay, Lesbian Consumers Favor 'Friendly' Brands
Brandweek
May 15, 2008
Bravo, Apple, Showtime, HBO, Absolut and Levi were cited as the gay-friendliest brands, in a study released this week by Clark, Martire & Bartolomeo. On the other hand, Wal-Mart, Dunkin' Donuts, Cracker Barrel, ExxonMobil and Samsung received the lowest marks.
The Prime Access/PlanetOut Gay and Lesbian Consumer Study, which claims to be one of the largest studies of gay and lesbian consumer habits and brand perceptions, surveyed 2,259 adults of which 757 identified themselves as homosexuals. Conducted by opinion research firm CM&B, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., the study revealed that more than two-thirds of gay and lesbian consumers said they were more likely to buy from a company they consider gay-friendly and 71% said they favored brands that include gay imagery in their advertising, as Levi Strauss did last year with a TV ad for Levi's 501 jeans.
"The study reveals that gays and lesbians are fiercely loyal customers to brands they perceive as reaching out to them," said Howard Buford, president and CEO of Prime Access, New York, a multicultural ad agency that commissioned the survey. "A marketing communications program directed at the gay and lesbian audience can be a significant opportunity for brands to build business."
Gay and lesbian participants were twice as likely (60%) as straight counterparts (34%) to say that people seek their advice, which makes them valuable as word-of-mouth ambassadors. Almost half (47%) of gays and lesbians surveyed said sexual orientation was the community that most defined them, followed by gender (45%) and religion (28%). Thirty-six percent of straight respondents said they most identified with gender, followed by nationality (32%) and religion (30%).
The report also polled 3,156 readers of PlanetOut brands like Gay.com and The Advocate. Eighty-five percent of PlanetOut respondents said they were more likely to purchase products from gay-friendly companies and 36% considered themselves to be in the know.
The Prime Access/PlanetOut study comes less than a year after Community Marketing, a gay and lesbian marketing consultancy in San Francisco, released the Gay Consumer Index last August. That report, which was sponsored by Absolut Vodka, drew from more than 26,000 responses concerning behaviors like Internet usage, dining frequency, and plasma and HDTV purchases.
Back to top
Consumers Are Dining In More – At The Supermarket
Brandweek
May 11, 2008
A recession may not be officially under way, but it has already claimed a victim and a beneficiary – casual dining chains and supermarkets, respectively.
Some argue that the frozen food category is also suddenly hot.
Traffic for casual dining, a segment that includes Applebee's, Ruby Tuesdays and TGI Friday's, fell 0.3% in the first quarter of 2008. But industry watchers say those ex-diners aren't necessarily cooking at home. Instead, they're gravitating to prepared foods at supermarkets like Publix and Whole Foods Market.
The Food Marketing Institute also released a survey of 2,020 last week showing that 71% of respondents say they are cooking at home more and eating out less at restaurants.
"They're trading down and trading out," said Ron Paul, president of Technomic, Chicago. Paul said the last time consumers abandoned higher-end restaurants (where waiter service is offered and tips are required), Boston Market was well-position ed to benefit from the change. "Boston Market was a factor," he said, "but they disappeared."
Prepared foods account for almost $5 billion a year in sales at supermarkets nationally, per the International Dairy Deli Bakery Association in Madison, Wisc.
Meanwhile, there's some evidence that consumers may be reaching for frozen dinners—at least some of them—more often. Overall the $6.3 billion industry was flat from last year, growing only 2%, according to IRI, a Chicago-based market research firm, whose figures exclude Wal-Mart and warehouse clubs.
Earlier this month, JP Morgan analyst Pablo Zuanic wrote a note to clients stating that Heinz's entire frozen dinners platform—a slate that includes Smart Ones and Boston Market—was up 42% in the prior four weeks, a rate he called "remarkable." But other analysts who follow the segment say it's less a case of a mass consumer embrace of the category than continued innovations, most notably a new wave of "steamer" products which claim to do a better job retaining the taste than prior microwaveable dinners. "A lot of it comes down to product innovation," said Matt Arnold, an analyst for Edward Jones, who said the steamers offer "a slightly better tasting meal than what you tend to usually get."
Another bright spot is frozen pizza, a category that rose 5.3% last year, per IRI. Jamie Mattikow, vp-marketing for Kraft Pizza Co., said premium pizza lines, like Digiorno and California Pizza Kitchen, were driving sales. "We're seeing a lot of growth in new products," Mattikow said, adding that additional growth was expected in the company's Digiorno For One pizza line and its newest offering, Digiorno Ultimate Focaccia pizza products, which was introduced this month.
Back to top
|
 |